Accept All

A cautionary example, made in good faith

You probably pressed “Accept all” today. Do you know what you agreed to?

This site is built out of the same dark patterns used on you every day. The difference is that we tell you which ones, and why they work. Everything you read here is sourced — including the parts describing what could go wrong.

This site has no server, no analytics and no third parties. Everything shown about you is computed in your browser and never leaves it.

Two things you can check yourself

Don't take our word for it. Both panels below read from your own browser, right now, and you can verify all of it in developer tools.

Cookies on this machine

You have not accepted tracking, so the list below is short. The one cookie that may be here does nothing but remember your choice.

No cookies are set.

See it yourself in developer tools
  1. Open developer tools: F12, or Ctrl/Cmd + Shift + I.
  2. Go to “Application” in Chrome, or “Storage” in Firefox.
  3. Select “Cookies”, then this site. The same names are listed there.

The values are random identifiers generated locally in your browser. This site has no server to send them to, and makes no network requests at all. You can confirm that in the Network tab.

What we already know, having asked nothing

Tracking does not need cookies. Your browser volunteers these signals unprompted, and taken together they are often enough to recognise your specific machine.

All of it is computed in your browser and displayed only here. Nothing is transmitted — there is no server to transmit to. Watch the Network tab while you press the button.

How things stand

What cookies are actually used for today

Nothing in this section is speculation. Every card points to a source you can read yourself.

Documented

The law is stricter than people think

Section 3-15 of the Norwegian Electronic Communications Act came into force on 1 January 2025. It requires prior consent, valid under the GDPR, before anyone stores or retrieves information from your equipment. The provision is technology-neutral and applies whether or not the information is personal data.

Valid consent must be freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous, given through an affirmative action, demonstrable and as easy to withdraw as it was to give. Most consent banners you encounter fail on at least one of these.

Supervision is split: Nkom assesses whether a technical solution falls under the provision and whether the exemptions apply, while the Data Protection Authority assesses whether the information given is adequate and whether the consent holds up.

Documented

What happens in the milliseconds before an advert appears

When a page with ad space loads, a bid request goes out to a large number of companies at once. It typically contains what you are looking at, roughly where you are, what device you are on and an identifier that follows you onwards.

The Irish Council for Civil Liberties estimated this happens 178 trillion times a year across the United States and Europe combined. Per person that averages 376 times daily in Europe and 747 in the US.

Everyone who receives a bid request gets the data — including those who do not bid. There is no mechanism for taking it back.

Documented

Tracking where you would least expect it

The Markup tested the websites of the 100 largest hospitals in the United States in 2022 and found the Meta Pixel on 33 of them. It sent data to Facebook every time someone clicked to book a doctor's appointment.

At seven health systems the pixel sat inside password-protected patient portals, where it collected information about prescriptions, sexual orientation and health conditions.

After the investigation was published, 28 hospitals removed or blocked the pixel — which also means it had been sitting there doing its job until somebody went looking.

Documented

Consent banners are mostly unlawful already

A review of the five most widely used consent platforms across the 10,000 most visited UK websites found that only 11.8% of 680 banners examined met the minimum requirements of European law.

The field experiment in the same study showed why the design pays: removing the reject button from the first page increased consent by 22–23 percentage points. Putting granular controls on the first page reduced it by 8–20 percentage points.

The design, then, is not accidental, and it is not the result of poor craftsmanship. It is calibrated.

Documented

“Consent or pay” — where Norway stands

Schibsted introduced an arrangement under which readers pay 39 kroner a month to avoid personalised advertising, across titles including Aftenposten and VG.

The Norwegian Data Protection Authority questions whether consent is genuinely freely given when the alternative is to pay, and its director Line Coll has said that privacy is a human right one should not have to pay for. The authority has not concluded that the arrangement is unlawful, and has asked the industry to await the European Data Protection Board's work. The Norwegian Consumer Council has lodged a complaint.

In April 2024 the EDPB stated that large online platforms will in most cases be unable to obtain valid consent through a bare choice between consenting and paying, and that an equivalent alternative without behavioural advertising should be offered. The opinion is not binding. The legal position is therefore contested, not settled.

Documented

When tracking moves out into the street

Flock Safety supplies automatic licence plate readers to American police forces. The cameras record which vehicles pass where and when, and searches run across a nationwide network.

An internal audit in Albany, Georgia in July 2026 led to five officers being dismissed and subsequently arrested over searches with no legitimate investigative purpose. A San Francisco audit published on 17 June 2026 found 299 unlawful queries of the city's data over a single year, made by federal and out-of-state agencies.

The Institute for Justice keeps a running count of cases in which officers used such systems to keep tabs on current or former partners. As of 1 August 2026 the count had reached at least 28, with the bulk of them since 2024.

Worst case

What becomes possible once the data exists

This section describes scenarios. These are not claims about what is happening in Norway today, and should not be read that way.

Each step is nevertheless anchored in something that has already happened somewhere. The point is not that the worst case is likely, but that none of the building blocks are missing. The infrastructure exists, and it is made to outlast the political conditions it came into being under.

Scenario

The merge

Location data from the advertising industry says where your phone has been. Licence plate readers say where your car has been. Separately they are fragments.

Combined, they become a continuous movement history: who you visited, how long you stayed, how often you returned. Neither part required a warrant, because neither is an official register — they are bought or collected.

The San Francisco audit showed that data gathered by one agency becomes available in practice to others, including across jurisdictions, without the original limits travelling with it: 299 unlawful queries in a single year.

Scenario

The insider

Systems are not primarily abused by enemies. They are abused by people with lawful access and private motives.

The Institute for Justice count is the most concrete illustration: at least 28 known cases of officers using licence plate readers to monitor current or former partners, most of them since 2024. Those are the cases that were caught.

Any database of where people move is simultaneously a tool for whoever inside the organisation has a reason to want to know where one particular person is.

Scenario

Retroactive reach

Data is collected under one set of rules and retained into the next. What was unremarkable to do last year may be an offence next year — and last year's log still exists.

As a mechanism this is not hypothetical. It is precisely because the logs existed that the Albany audit could document, after the fact, what the five officers had searched for. Logs are neutral instruments: they expose abuse, and they enable it.

The question is not whether today's authorities would misuse them. The question is who has access in ten years, and what they are looking for by then.

Scenario

The chilling effect

Surveillance does not need to be used in order to work. It is enough that people know it exists.

The ACLU has documented how searchable movement databases fall unevenly: those seeking healthcare, attending protests or belonging to groups the police already watch more closely carry the risk first.

The effect is not measured in arrests, but in everything that does not happen — the meetings people skip, the pages they don't visit, the help they don't seek.

What you can do

Practical measures, in order of effect

None of these make you invisible. Together they nevertheless remove the large majority of commercial tracking, and they take under half an hour to set up in total.

  1. 1

    Install uBlock Origin

    The single measure with the greatest effect. It blocks trackers before they load, not after. It works fully in Firefox; in Chrome it is constrained by Manifest V3, which is a good reason to use Firefox.

  2. 2

    Change browser, or switch on what you already have

    Firefox has strict tracking protection built in, Safari has Intelligent Tracking Prevention, and Brave blocks by default. All three stop cross-site tracking without any further effort.

  3. 3

    Stop pressing “Accept all”

    The law requires that refusing be as easy as agreeing. If the reject button is hidden behind several clicks, that is itself a sign the banner does not meet the standard — and something you can complain about.

  4. 4

    Automate your consent answers

    Consent-O-Matic answers banners for you according to rules you set. uBlock Origin's annoyance lists remove many of them entirely.

  5. 5

    Block at the network level

    NextDNS or Pi-hole stop tracking for every device in the house at once, including those with no browser — smart TVs, speakers and apps with no settings of their own.

  6. 6

    Turn off your phone's advertising ID

    iOS: Settings → Privacy & Security → Tracking. Android: Settings → Google → Ads → Delete advertising ID. This breaks the link between your apps.

  7. 7

    Complain when something is plainly wrong

    The Norwegian Data Protection Authority accepts complaints about consent mechanisms. In practice, enforcement happens where somebody speaks up, and a complaint costs you a few minutes.

All of this is checkable

Every claim on this site is tied to a source with a date and a link. Where we describe scenarios, it says plainly that they are scenarios. You should not believe this site either — you should be able to check it.

See all sources →

Your consent

Current choice: not decided

About this site

“Accept All” is a teaching tool. The consent banner is a deliberate exaggeration, and the dark patterns in it are real patterns used on purpose and named afterwards. The factual content is not exaggerated.

No analytics. No third parties. No server. The site is static files, and everything computed about you is computed in your browser and stays there.

Built as an independent public-information project. George Orwell's “1984” entered the public domain in Norway and the EU on 1 January 2021. No affiliation with Schibsted, Flock Safety or any other party discussed.